CONGRESS GRILLS OFFICIALS ON 'NON-HUMAN' CRAFT
By a Staff Correspondent
WASHINGTON D.C. – The hallowed halls of Congress buzzed with an electricity not felt in decades as a former intelligence officer testified under oath about a top-secret government program. The subject? The retrieval and reverse-engineering of craft of "non-human origin."
David Grusch, a decorated veteran of the Air Force, told a stunned House Oversight Committee that the United States has been in possession of "intact and partially intact" vehicles from unknown origins for decades. He claimed knowledge of a "multi-decade" program that has been illegally withheld from congressional oversight.
Lawmakers from both sides of the aisle listened intently, their usual partisan squabbles replaced by a shared, grave concern. While the Pentagon has denied these explosive claims, Mr. Grusch's testimony, corroborated by other military witnesses, has sent shockwaves through the capital and, indeed, the world. The startling testimony suggests that the truth about what is flying in our skies may be far stranger than ever imagined.
NORTHERN NEIGHBORS LAUNCH 'SKY WATCHERS'
From our Ottawa Bureau
OTTAWA – Not to be outdone by their American counterparts, Canadian officials have announced a formal initiative to investigate Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena. The "Sky Canada Project," spearheaded by the nation's top scientific advisors, aims to create a standardized system for collecting and analyzing reports of strange sightings from pilots, police, and the public.
The move comes after a report highlighted Canada's "fragmented" approach to the issue. While officials stress the project is not intended to hunt for "little green men," they acknowledge that a small but significant number of sightings remain unexplained after rigorous investigation.
THE TRUTH IS OUT THERE... BUT IS IT IN D.C.?
An Editorial
For years, reports of flying saucers were dismissed as swamp gas or weather balloons. Those who saw them were ridiculed. Now, men with medals and high security clearances are saying the same things under oath.
The Pentagon issues denials, but the sheer volume of credible testimony demands more than a simple "no." If these programs exist, the public has a right to know. If they don't, then what, precisely, are our most experienced pilots encountering in the skies? The era of easy answers is over.